Ozim
Ozim v. The California Endowment
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAISY OZIM, Case No. 20-cv-06517-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE REMAND
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 6 THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT, Defendant.
12 Pro se plaintiff Daisy Ozim originally filed this case in the California Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1. Ozim removed her own complaint, ostensibly on federal question grounds. Id. The California Endowment (“TCE”) asks to remand the case back to the state court, and for costs and fees. Dkt. No. 6. The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The case was removed improvidently and without jurisdiction, and is remanded to the Superior Court for the County of Alameda. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The Court declines to award costs and fees. BACKGROUND Ozim filed her original complaint in the California Superior Court on March 12, 2020, and served TCE with the summons and complaint on or about May 28, 2020. Dkt. No. 6-1 (Fenske Decl.) ¶ 2. The California…