Johnson v. Progreso Development, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20205:20-cv-02167California4,465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SCOTT JOHNSON,

Case No. 5:20-cv-02167-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES PROGRESO DEVELOPMENT, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $11,610.00 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12205, California Civil Code § 52(a). Dkt. No. 20 (“Motion”). Defendants Progresso Development, LLC (“Progresso”) and Meza Corporation (“Meza” collectively “Defendants”) oppose the motion on the grounds that the fees requested are unreasonably high. Having considered the parties papers, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff’s motion. I. Background Plaintiff is a person with disabilities who uses a wheelchair for mobility. On March 31, 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.