McGhee

McGhee v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20204:18-cv-05999California1,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 DEREK L MCGHEE, Case No. 18-cv-05999-JSW (RMI)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY

v. LETTER BRIEFS

TESORO REFINING & MARKETING Re: Dkt. Nos. 90, 93 COMPANY LLC, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Now pending before the court is a discovery dispute wherein Plaintiff seeks to compel pre- certification class-wide discovery relating to his rest break and minimum-wage claims. See Joint Supp. Ltr. Br. (dkt. 93) at 1. Plaintiff initially presented his arguments in a letter brief filed on September 30, 2020 (see Ltr. Br. (dkt. 90) at 1-4); however, because the Letter Brief was non- compliant with the undersigned’s General Standing Order, and because it was clear that the letter had been filed without being preceded by a good-faith effort to meet and confer (i.e., Plaintiff was attempting to compel deposition testimony that Defendants had already offered to provide), the Parties were ordered (see dkt. 92)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.