Anderson
Anderson v. SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KELLY NELSON and JULIETTE Case No. 15-cv-02172-JSW
MORIZUR,
FINDINGS OF FACT AND Plaintiffs, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR v. PARTIAL JUDGMENT AND FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL ON
SEAWORLD PARKS AND STANDING
ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Dkt. No. 547 Defendant.
13 On March 9, 10, and 11, 2020, the parties appeared before the Court for a bench trial on 14 the issues of whether Plaintiffs, Juliette Morizur (“Ms. Morizur”) and Kelly Nelson (“Ms. 15 Nelson”) (collectively Plaintiffs, unless otherwise noted), have Article III standing to seek 16 injunctive relief and statutory standing to pursue claims against Defendant SeaWorld Parks and 17 Entertainment, Inc. (“SeaWorld”) under California’s Unfair Competition Law, Business and 18 Professions Code section 17200, et seq. (the “UCL Claims”), California’s False Advertising Law, 19 Business and Professions Code section 17500, et…