Anderson

Anderson v. SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20204:15-cv-02172California11,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KELLY NELSON and JULIETTE Case No. 15-cv-02172-JSW

MORIZUR,

FINDINGS OF FACT AND Plaintiffs, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR v. PARTIAL JUDGMENT AND FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL ON

SEAWORLD PARKS AND STANDING

ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Dkt. No. 547 Defendant.

13 On March 9, 10, and 11, 2020, the parties appeared before the Court for a bench trial on 14 the issues of whether Plaintiffs, Juliette Morizur (“Ms. Morizur”) and Kelly Nelson (“Ms. 15 Nelson”) (collectively Plaintiffs, unless otherwise noted), have Article III standing to seek 16 injunctive relief and statutory standing to pursue claims against Defendant SeaWorld Parks and 17 Entertainment, Inc. (“SeaWorld”) under California’s Unfair Competition Law, Business and 18 Professions Code section 17200, et seq. (the “UCL Claims”), California’s False Advertising Law, 19 Business and Professions Code section 17500, et…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.