Zoho Corporation v. Sentius International, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20204:19-cv-00001California6,312 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZOHO CORPORATION, CASE NO. 19-cv-00001-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING ZOHO’S MOTION FOR

vs. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SENTIUS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 81 Defendant.

SENTIUS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Counterclaim-Plaintiff, vs.

ZOHO CORPORATION ET AL., Counterclaim-Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Zoho Corporation brings this declaratory judgment action against defendant Sentius International, LLC (“Sentius”) for judgment that it does not infringe Sentius’ patents. Sentius counterclaims against Zoho Corporation and Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd. (collectively, “Zoho”) for infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. RE43,633 (the “’633 Patent”) and 7,672,985 (the “’985 Patent”). Now before the Court is Zoho’s motion for partial summary judgment. Zoho argues that the ’633 Patent is invalid for lack of written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112. Specifically, Zoho claims that the specification…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.