Sahota

Sahota v. Allen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20203:20-cv-03180California631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEEPAK SAHOTA, Case No. 20-cv-03180-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. ENFORCE

NATHAN ALLEN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendants.

On June 4, 2020, I granted in part petitioner Deepak Sahota’s Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”). Dkt. No. 22. In that Order, I denied without prejudice his Petition for habeas relief in light of COVID-19, but I granted his claim for habeas relief in light of his unduly prolonged detention. I ordered that Sahota be given a bond hearing with appropriate procedural protections within 30 days or else be released. Id. Subsequently, a hearing was held on June 25, 2020. Dkt. No. 28-1. Sahota was represented by counsel, who argued and introduced evidence in support of his position that he should be released on bond. Id. On June 30, 2020, the IJ issued a decision finding that DHS had met its burden of proving Sahota is a danger to the community and denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.