Lain
Lain v. Pleasanton Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division JOSEPH LAIN, on behalf of his minor child Case No. 20-cv-07089-LB
A.L.,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING TRO 13 v. Re: ECF No. 6
PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.
17 The plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to require the 18 defendants — the Pleasanton Unified School District (“PUSD”) and the Contra Costa County 19 Office of Education (“CCCOE”) — to comply with a “Stay Put” order issued by the California 20 Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) on August 24, 2020.1 The claims in this case and the 21 related case (No. 20-cv-2350-LB) involve the plaintiff’s challenge to whether the defendants 22 provided a free and appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to the plaintiff’s daughter A.L.2 To 23 address the FAPE claim, in August 2019, the parties agreed to an individual education plan 24 (“IEP”) for A.L. that provided for A.L.’s education at the Mauzy school in Contra Costa County
26 1 Mot.…