Clancy

Clancy v. Allstate Insurance

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20205:19-cv-04257California872 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NORMAN CLANCY, Case No. 19-cv-04257-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT

ALLSTATE INSURANCE, [Re: ECF 13] Defendant.

12 On October 6, 2020, Pro se plaintiff Norman Clancy filed an amended complaint, see ECF 13 11, in a case in which judgment has already been entered, against him. See Judgment, ECF 10. 14 The Court struck this complaint on October 7, 2020, and instructed Mr. Clancy that if he wanted 15 the Court to set aside its judgment against him, he needed to move for relief from judgment under 16 Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 60(b)(1), showing either mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect 17 that justified the Court relieving him of the final judgment. See Order, ECF 12. The Court was 18 also clear that this needed to be filed by October 17, 2020, which marked one year after the 19 judgment had been entered against him and the deadline for relief under Rule 60(b). Id. 20 On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.