Freeman

Freeman v. Foss

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20204:19-cv-02594California2,671 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRAVON LEON FREEMAN, Case No. 19-cv-02594-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT; DENYING

v. DEFNEDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS; DIRECTIONS TO

TAMMY FOSS, et al., DEFENDANTS; REQUIRING

PLAINTIFF TO EFFECT SERVICE ON

Defendants. DEFENDANT PAICIO Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 36,

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at Kern Valley State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, regarding events that happened at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) where he was previously housed. This order addresses the pending motions. DISCUSSION I. Defendants Sandquist, Banger, Cervantes, Salgado, and Foss’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants Sandquist, Banger, Cervantes, Salgado, and Foss (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, arguing that it is …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.