Freeman
Freeman v. Foss
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20204:19-cv-02594California2,671 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRAVON LEON FREEMAN, Case No. 19-cv-02594-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT; DENYING
v. DEFNEDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS; DIRECTIONS TO
TAMMY FOSS, et al., DEFENDANTS; REQUIRING
PLAINTIFF TO EFFECT SERVICE ON
Defendants. DEFENDANT PAICIO Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 36,
13 Plaintiff, an inmate at Kern Valley State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, regarding events that happened at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) where he was previously housed. This order addresses the pending motions. DISCUSSION I. Defendants Sandquist, Banger, Cervantes, Salgado, and Foss’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants Sandquist, Banger, Cervantes, Salgado, and Foss (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, arguing that it is …