Hyams

Hyams v. CVS Health Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20204:18-cv-06278California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RYAN HYAMS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06278-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE

v. PRETRIAL ORDER

CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 138 Defendants.

12 On September 24, 2020 Plaintiffs Ryan Hyams and Regine Duhon (“Plaintiffs”) moved to compel the lifting of certain redactions by Defendants CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, and CVS Rx Services, Inc. (collectively “CVS”). See Dkt. No. 116. On October 8, Magistrate Judge Illman issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ motion. See Dkt. No. 127. On October 22, Plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from Judge Illman’s non-dispositive pretrial order. See Dkt. No. 138. A pretrial order by a magistrate judge will be reversed only if it “is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). The Court has carefully reviewed Judge Illman’s order, Plaintiffs’ motion, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.