Critchfield
Critchfield v. Preston Pipelines Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division JAMES CRITCHFIELD, Case No. 20-cv-02981-LB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT
PRESTON PIPELINES INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 42 Defendants. 16 The court previously dismissed Mr. Critchfield’s complaint with leave to amend because he did not properly serve the defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and he did not plausibly state a claim for employment discrimination.1 The court extended Mr. Critchfield until September 24, 2020, to file an amended complaint when he missed the initial deadline to amend by August 27, 2020. The court warned that the failure to file an amended complaint may result in a dismissal of the case.2 23 24 25 26 27 1 Order – ECF No. 28. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of documents. Mr. Critchfield filed an amended…