Shultz

Shultz v. TTAC Publishing, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20204:20-cv-04375California3,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHELLE SHULTZ, Case No. 20-cv-04375-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION

v. Re: Dkt. No. 14 TTAC PUBLISHING, LLC, Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendant TTAC Publishing, LLC. See Dkt. No. 14. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michelle Shultz filed this action against Defendant on June 30, 2020. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff alleges that she received a series of unsolicited telemarketing text messages on her personal cellular telephone by or on behalf of Defendant beginning in November 2019. See id. at ¶¶ 8–10, 14–15, 17, 19, 21–22. She further alleges that these text messages were sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. See id. at ¶¶ 13,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.