Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20205:19-cv-01692California1,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 UNILOC USA, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-01692-EJD (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

v. APPLE DOCUMENT SUBPOENA TO

PENDRELL

APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. No. 168 Defendants.

13 Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and non-party Pendrell Technologies, LLC (“Pendrell”) have filed a joint discovery dispute letter concerning Apple’s document subpoena to Pendrell. Dkt. No. 168. Apple asks for an order compelling Pendrell to produce documents responsive to the subpoena and to prepare a privilege log. Pendrell objects that this Court has no authority to enforce Apple’s subpoena because Pendrell is a non-party located in the state of Washington, beyond this Court’s jurisdiction. In the alternative, Pendrell objects to Apple’s request on the merits and seeks a protective order. The Court deems this matter suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.