Amy
Amy v. Curtis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
“AMY”, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02184-PJH Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER GRANTING FIRST MOTION
TO STRIKE AND DENYING SECOND
RANDALL STEVEN CURTIS, MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 97, 121
13 Before the court are plaintiffs’ motions to strike. Dkts. 97, 121. The matters are fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court rules as follows. BACKGROUND Fifteen plaintiffs, proceeding under pseudonyms, collectively bring this civil action against defendant Randall Curtis (“defendant”) based on his criminal child pornography offenses in violation of title 18 U.S.C. § 2252. In their first amended complaint (“FAC”), plaintiffs assert a single cause of action under 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a), which allows victims of child pornography to…