Anderson

Anderson v. Cueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20204:20-cv-06806California891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID LEE ANDERSON, Case No. 20-cv-06806-PJH

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY

CLOSING CASE

DANIEL CUEVA,

Respondent.

12 Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a pro se writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner was convicted in Alameda County which is in this district, so venue is proper here. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Petitioner also seeks a stay to exhaust further claims. BACKGROUND Petitioner was convicted on August 19, 2016, for mayhem, assault with a firearm, second degree robbery and assault with means likely to produce great bodily injury. Petition at 1. He was sentenced to 46 years in state prison. Id. His direct appeals were denied. Petition at 2. DISCUSSION STANDARD OF REVIEW This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.