Denicolo
Denicolo v. Viking Client Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 RONALD G. DENICOLO, ET AL., CASE NO. 19-cv-00210-YGR
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
vs. Dkt. No. 142 VIKING SERVICES., Defendants.
Defendant Viking Client Services, LLC has filed a Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3). (Dkt. No. 142). Viking seeks reconsideration of the Court’s September 30, 2020 Order Denying Viking’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 137 [“Order Denying Viking’s MSJ”].) Having considered the papers submitted, the Court DENIES the Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration. Under Rule 54(b), “[r]econsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” School Dist. No. 1J v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). Local Rule…