Farrell

Farrell v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20204:20-cv-03709California3,568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CASE NO. 4:20-cv-03709 YGR JAMES FARRELL, BY AND THROUGH THE

SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE FARRELL ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

LIVING TRUST, LAURA KAUFMAN, REMAND; DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS AS MOOT

Plaintiff, v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 7,

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL.,

11 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff James Farrell, by and through the successor trustee of the Farrell Living Trust, Laura Kaufman, brings this action for claims arising out of alleged financial elder abuse. Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Fawn Periera, and Kevin Prario (“JP Morgan defendants”) removed this action on the basis that this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Now pending is (1) Farrell’s motion to remand the action to state court on the ground that the action cannot be removed on the basis of 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because complete diversity of citizenship does not exist; and (2) JP Morgan defendants’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.