Dominguez
Dominguez v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMOND D., Case No. 19-cv-07594-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 20,
SECURITY,
11 Defendant. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Raymond D. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, denying his claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 20 (Pl.’s Mot.), 29 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16- 5, the motions have been submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion and REMANDS this case for further proceedings consistent with this order. II. …