Javate

Bradford v. Javate

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20204:20-cv-06833California400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 20-cv-06833-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

v. RESPONSE

JAVATE, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff seems to imply that he has three prior strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). He seeks to proceed with this case despite the prior strikes because he states he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. In addition, plaintiff seeks to be excused from exhausting his administrative remedies due to an ongoing conspiracy against him. While plaintiff may be able to proceed with this case even if he is three strikes barred, he still must exhaust administrative remedies. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996) (“PLRA”), amended 42 U.S.C. § 1997e to provide that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.