Javate
Bradford v. Javate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 20-cv-06833-PJH
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
v. RESPONSE
JAVATE, et al., Defendants.
12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff seems to imply that he has three prior strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). He seeks to proceed with this case despite the prior strikes because he states he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. In addition, plaintiff seeks to be excused from exhausting his administrative remedies due to an ongoing conspiracy against him. While plaintiff may be able to proceed with this case even if he is three strikes barred, he still must exhaust administrative remedies. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996) (“PLRA”), amended 42 U.S.C. § 1997e to provide that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. §…