Malhotra

Malhotra v. Sonim Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20203:19-cv-06416California926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID STERRETT, Case No. 19-cv-06416-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. INTERVENE; VACATING HEARING

SONIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

12 Before the Court is the "Motion to Intervene and Object," filed October 7, 2020, by Beecham Pearson, Stephen Ly, and Michael Hostak ("Proposed Intervenors"). Plaintiff David Sterrett ("Sterrett") has filed opposition, in which all defendants have joined, and to which the Proposed Intervenors have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision on the above-described written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for November 13, 2020, and rules as follows. In the instant action, Sterrett, on his own behalf and on behalf of a putative class, alleges defendants violated §§ 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, by making false statements and omissions in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.