Malhotra
Malhotra v. Sonim Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID STERRETT, Case No. 19-cv-06416-MMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. INTERVENE; VACATING HEARING
SONIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.
12 Before the Court is the "Motion to Intervene and Object," filed October 7, 2020, by Beecham Pearson, Stephen Ly, and Michael Hostak ("Proposed Intervenors"). Plaintiff David Sterrett ("Sterrett") has filed opposition, in which all defendants have joined, and to which the Proposed Intervenors have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision on the above-described written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for November 13, 2020, and rules as follows. In the instant action, Sterrett, on his own behalf and on behalf of a putative class, alleges defendants violated §§ 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, by making false statements and omissions in a…