Cohen

Cohen v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20203:19-cv-05322California10,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW COHEN, TIMOTHY

HORNICK, KALEAH C. ALLEN,

KIMBERLY BENJAMIN, MARK No. C 19-05322 WHA

WEILER, MATT KOPPIN, SCOTT

CISCHKE, ALBERT COLLINS, PAUL

COLETTI, KRYSTLE FAERN, RODOLFO

CABRERA, BRANDY DAVIS, WILLIAM ORDER ON MOTION FOR

ZIDE, DAVID HEDICKER, NANCY SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MAEKAWA, CATHERINE GOODWIN,

KATHLEEN BOGGS, KIMBERLY

MODESITT, MARK KUNZE, ARIANA

RYAN, BECKY WELLINGTON, M. GAIL

SUNDELL, VICTOR PERLMAN, and ZACHARY GOMOLEKOFF, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.

APPLE INC., Defendant.

22 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, this order holds that the FCC’s radio frequency radiation exposure regulations preempt plaintiffs’ tort and consumer-fraud claims. STATEMENT At all material times, defendant Apple, Inc., manufactured and sold a series of additional functions based on advanced computing capability,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.