Cohen
Cohen v. Apple Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20203:19-cv-05322California10,315 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANDREW COHEN, TIMOTHY
HORNICK, KALEAH C. ALLEN,
KIMBERLY BENJAMIN, MARK No. C 19-05322 WHA
WEILER, MATT KOPPIN, SCOTT
CISCHKE, ALBERT COLLINS, PAUL
COLETTI, KRYSTLE FAERN, RODOLFO
CABRERA, BRANDY DAVIS, WILLIAM ORDER ON MOTION FOR
ZIDE, DAVID HEDICKER, NANCY SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MAEKAWA, CATHERINE GOODWIN,
KATHLEEN BOGGS, KIMBERLY
MODESITT, MARK KUNZE, ARIANA
RYAN, BECKY WELLINGTON, M. GAIL
SUNDELL, VICTOR PERLMAN, and ZACHARY GOMOLEKOFF, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.
APPLE INC., Defendant.
22 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, this order holds that the FCC’s radio frequency radiation exposure regulations preempt plaintiffs’ tort and consumer-fraud claims. STATEMENT At all material times, defendant Apple, Inc., manufactured and sold a series of additional functions based on advanced computing capability,…