In re Eventbrite, Inc. Securities Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20205:19-cv-02019California2,852 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 MICHAEL GOMES, et al., Case No. 5:19-cv-02019-EJD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. INTERVENE; CONTINUING

HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR

EVENTBRITE, INC., et al., PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

SETTLEMENT

Defendants.

Re: Dkt. Nos. 62,

This action arises out of Defendants’ alleged violations of Section 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K, and Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Presently before the Court are: (1) Lead Plaintiffs Michael Gomes, Melvin Pastores, Mohit Uppal and Bruce Bones’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement (“Motion”); and (2) Eventbrite shareholders Crystal L. Clemons and Christina Cotte’s motion to intervene for the purpose of requesting a 90 day continuance of the hearing on the Motion. Both motions are scheduled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.