Moody v. Andrew M. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DONNA M., Case No. 19-cv-03134-DMR Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW S. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 20 Defendant. 11 Plaintiff Donna M. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the 12 Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which 13 found Plaintiff no longer disabled due to medical improvement and therefore terminated her 14 disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket No. 15 19.] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 20.] For the reasons stated below, 16 the court grants Plaintiff’s motion in part and denies the Commissioner’s motion.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
18 On February 27, 2005, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) found that Plaintiff was 19 disabled beginning on January 1, 2003. The date of that decision is known as the “comparison 20 point decision” or CPD. Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 496-99. At the time of the CPD, 21 Plaintiff had an anxiety…