Declue

Declue v. Family Law Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20204:20-cv-05808California7,918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALAN DECLUE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05808-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 14, 17

Before the court is plaintiff Alan DeClue’s (“plaintiff”) motion for a preliminary injunction. Dkt. 12. Also before the court are defendants County of Alameda’s (“Alameda County”), Alameda County’s District Attorney’s Office (“D.A.’s Office”), and deputy district attorney Nancy O’Malley’s (“O’Malley”) (jointly, the “Alameda County Defendants”) motion to dismiss, Dkt. 14, as well as defendants City of Livermore’s (“Livermore”), Livermore Police Chief Michael Harris’s (“Harris”), and Livermore Police Officer Paul Giacometti’s (“Officer Giacometti”) (jointly, the “Livermore Defendants”) motion to dismiss, Dkt. 17. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their argument and the relevant legal authority,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.