Rojas

Rojas v. Ci-Vil Enterprises

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20205:20-cv-00465California1,096 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC ROJAS, Case No. 20-cv-00465-NC Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

CI-VIL ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Eric Rojas is suing Defendants Ci-Vil Enterprises and AK Paladin LLC for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-89 and related California statutes. ECF 17 at 1. Defendants move for summary judgment on Rojas’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) on grounds of mootness. ECF 31-1 at 3. The Court DENIES Defendants’ motion finding that there remain genuine disputes as to material facts such that Defendants are not entitled to summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND Rojas, an individual with a disability, brought this action against Defendants for violations of the ADA, California Health and Safety Code § 19955, the California Disabled Persons Act, and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. ECF 17 at 5-9. In his SAC,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.