Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20203:20-cv-02397California2,486 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TWITTER, INC., Case No. 20-cv-02397-LHK (VKD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DISPUTE RE
v. PROTECTIVE ORDER
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendant.
APPLE, INC., Case No. 20-cv-02460-LHK (VKD)
Plaintiff, v. Re: Dkt. No.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Defendant.
AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC., Case No. 20-cv-02995-LHK (VKD)
AND AT&T MOBILITY LLC,
19 Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 50 v.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
22 Defendant.
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a/ Verizon Case No. 20-cv-03092-LHK (VKD) Wireless, 24 Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 45 v.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
27 Defendant. Plaintiffs Twitter, Inc., Apple, Inc., AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. are…