Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20203:20-cv-02397California2,486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TWITTER, INC., Case No. 20-cv-02397-LHK (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISPUTE RE

v. PROTECTIVE ORDER

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendant.

APPLE, INC., Case No. 20-cv-02460-LHK (VKD)

Plaintiff, v. Re: Dkt. No.

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Defendant.

AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC., Case No. 20-cv-02995-LHK (VKD)

AND AT&T MOBILITY LLC,

19 Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 50 v.

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

22 Defendant.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a/ Verizon Case No. 20-cv-03092-LHK (VKD) Wireless, 24 Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 45 v.

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

27 Defendant. Plaintiffs Twitter, Inc., Apple, Inc., AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.