Rasmussen

Rasmussen v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20203:20-cv-06947California574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RULON V. RASMUSSEN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06947-SI

Plaintiffs, AND RELATED CASES: 20-6948, 20- 6953, 20-6954, 20-6955 & 20-6960 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' SAFEWAY, et al., COMBINED EX PARTE

APPLICATIONS TO STRIKE NOTICE

Defendants. OF REMOVAL AND REMANDING TO

STATE COURT

12 Re: Dkt. No. 25 13 On October 29, 2020, the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs’ combined ex parte application to strike removal and remand, filed in this case and five related cases. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the combined application and REMANDS these cases to state court. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 18 DISCUSSION Plaintiffs contend that the removing entities did not have the authority to remove the actions. The six cases at issue were removed from state court by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline LLC,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.