Reed

Reed v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20203:19-cv-07937California307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CHARLES CHRISTOPHER REED, Case No. 19-cv-07937-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT TO A

v. DISTRICT JUDGE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Charles Christopher Reed, a state prisoner at the Salinas Valley State Prison, filed this civil rights action in pro se for an injury that occurred while working in the prison kitchen. Dkt. No. 1. Mr. Reed consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 2. Mr. Reed was twice permitted to file an amended complaint to correct deficiencies in the pleadings. Dkt. Nos. 9, 11. Mr. Reed has filed a second amended complaint which fails to correct the deficiencies from his previous filings and is therefore subject to dismissal for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Dkt. No. 12. All named parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction before a magistrate judge may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.