Wilson
Wilson v. City of Walnut Creek
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON, Case No. 20-cv-02721-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO
CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, et al., EXTEND BRIEFING Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 53
13 Before the court is defendants City of Walnut Creek, Darryl R. Saffold, Gary Silva, Scott Brian Moorhouse, Sean Michael Conley, and Thomas Edward Chaplin’s (collectively, “defendants”) motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for resolution without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the motion, for the following reasons. BACKGROUND On April 20, 2020, plaintiff Michael Geary Wilson (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint alleging twenty claims: (1) fraud in preventing orders and judgments; (2)–(8) violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(2), 1985(3),…