Trim

Trim v. Mayvenn, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20203:20-cv-03917California3,487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LUCINE TRIM, individually and on Case No. 20-cv-03917-MMC behalf of all others similarly situated, AMENDED* Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY; CONTINUING

MAYVENN, INC., CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is defendant Mayvenn, Inc.’s (“Mayvenn”) “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, to Stay This Action,” filed September 8, 2020. Plaintiff Lucine Trim (“Trim”) has filed opposition, to which Mayvenn has replied. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND In the operative complaint, the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Trim alleges she has a cellular telephone number “for personal use,” which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.