Becker
Becker v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY B., Case No. 19-cv-02454-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 24 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff seeks social security benefits for a variety of physical and mental impairments including anxiety, depression, obesity, overactive bladder, bilateral shoulder pain, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”). (Administrative Record, (“AR”) 382-383, 378, 436, 447). Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his benefits claim. Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 23 and 24.) After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion,…