Coxon
Coxon v. United States District Court
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BENJAMIN COXON,
Case No. 20-cv-05636-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING NOVEMBER 13, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
10 Defendant.
12 Having granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the Court is required to review Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) to determine whether any claims are subject to dismissal on the basis that they: 1) are frivolous or malicious; (2) fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (3) seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Marks v. Solcum, 98 F.3d 494, 495 (9th Cir. 1996) . Here, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has not stated any viable claim. First, although the Complaint lists the United States District Court as the sole defendant, see Dkt. No. 1, it alleges no facts that relate to any…