Shaw

Shaw v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20204:18-cv-07295California3,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHAD S.,

Case No. 18-cv-07295-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 24 Defendant.

Plaintiff Chad S. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied him application for benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. [Docket Nos. 21 (“Pltf. Mot.”), 24 (“Pltf. Reply”).] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 24 (“Def. Mot.”).] For the reasons stated below, the court grants Plaintiff’s motion and denies the Commissioner’s cross-motion. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed an application for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits on February 4, 2016, and an application for Supplemental Security Income on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.