Martin

IXL Learning, Inc. v. Martin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20203:20-cv-02940California1,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IXL LEARNING, INC., Case No. 3:20-cv-02940-JD Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 11 DOMINICK MARTIN, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff IXL Learning (IXL), an online education company, filed a complaint under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, in response to a pre-suit demand letter from defendant Dominick Martin. The letter alleged that IXL’s website was not accessible to the visually impaired, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. Dkt. No. 1. IXL filed the complaint one day before Martin filed a lawsuit in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles alleging a disability discrimination claim solely under the Unruh Act. Martin seeks to dismiss IXL’s complaint on several grounds, and to strike the complaint under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16. Dkt. Nos. 10, 11. The Court declines to take up the declaratory relief claim, and the case is dismissed in favor of resolution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.