Malloy
Malloy v. Regents of the University of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
STEPHEN GROVE MALLOY, Case No: 19-cv-07995 SBA 6 Plaintiff, Related Case No: 20-cv-07312 SBA
VS. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY IFP
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DISMISSED AS DUPLICATIVE CALIFORNIA, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 1. PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. THE IFP ACTION On December 12, 2019, Plaintiff Stephen Grove Malloy (“Plaintiff”), proceeding 15|| pro se, filed in this Court an action against more than fifty defendants, Dkt. 1, along with an 16|| application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), Dkt. 2. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Uv Hixon, who was then presiding over the action, granted Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP. Dkt. 6. Magistrate Judge Hixon then screened the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e), finding that it failed to state a claim. Id. On January 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint, Dkt. 7, which Magistrate Judge…