Tuens

Tuens v. U.S. Bank National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20204:20-cv-03459California373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRACY TUENS, Case No. 20-cv-03459-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING CASE

v. 9 Re: ECF No. 30 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 This case originated in the San Francisco County Superior Court before Defendants removed it to federal court. ECF No. 1 at 2. Defendants assert that this Court has diversity jurisdiction because Plaintiff Tracy Tuens’s complaint does not state a valid claim of action against Defendant Oliveira. Id. at 4-8. On October 5, 2020, this Court issued an order to show cause why this case should not be remanded in light of its finding that Tuens “could plausibly allege additional facts in support of her FEHA claims that would make them viable.” ECF No. 29 at 10 (citing Tuens’s opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss, ECF No. 15 at 24, which stated that Tuens could “allege additional facts, such as: Oliveira engaged in hostile, belittling, condescending, and dismissive conduct that was continuous from the time she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.