Gold
Gold v. California Highway Patrol
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12 ARI GOLD, Case No. 20-CV-02990-LHK 13 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
v.
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
15 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 16 Defendants.
18 Plaintiff Ari Gold (“Plaintiff”) brings suit against Defendants California Highway Patrol 19 (“CHP”), Christopher Weaver (“Officer Weaver”), Kristin Cho (“Officer Cho”), and officers 20 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff (collectively, “Defendants”) based on excessive force. 21 Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Ari Gold (“Plaintiff”) for attorneys’ fees and costs 22 related to service of the complaint on Officers Weaver and Cho, ECF No. 17. Having considered 23 the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court hereby GRANTS 24 IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.
26 1 Case No. 20-CV-02990-LHK I. BACKGROUND On July 23, 2019, CHP officers,…