Gold

Gold v. California Highway Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20203:20-cv-02990California2,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12 ARI GOLD, Case No. 20-CV-02990-LHK 13 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

v.

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

15 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 16 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Ari Gold (“Plaintiff”) brings suit against Defendants California Highway Patrol 19 (“CHP”), Christopher Weaver (“Officer Weaver”), Kristin Cho (“Officer Cho”), and officers 20 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff (collectively, “Defendants”) based on excessive force. 21 Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Ari Gold (“Plaintiff”) for attorneys’ fees and costs 22 related to service of the complaint on Officers Weaver and Cho, ECF No. 17. Having considered 23 the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court hereby GRANTS 24 IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

26 1 Case No. 20-CV-02990-LHK I. BACKGROUND On July 23, 2019, CHP officers,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.