Savage

Savage v. Savage

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20204:19-cv-07994California2,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 COLETTE CLAIRE SAVAGE, Case No. 19-cv-07994-DMR

Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 39 MARK SAVAGE, Defendant.

Pro se Plaintiff Colette Savage filed a lawsuit against her brother, Defendant Mark Savage. She subsequently filed two motions for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint. On May 18, 2020, the court granted the motion to dismiss and dismissed the complaint on the ground that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims because they are barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The court also denied Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief and entered judgment the same day. [Docket Nos. 31, 32.] Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration and/or relief from the judgment. [Docket No. 33.] On September 18, 2020, while the motion for reconsideration was still pending, Plaintiff filed 20 a third motion for a preliminary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.