Saul

Garland v. Saul

Caution
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20204:19-cv-03308-DMRCalifornia4,718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID G.,

Case No. 19-cv-03308-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 27 Defendant.

Plaintiff David G. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied his application for benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket No. 18.] The Commissioner cross- moves to affirm. [Docket No. 27.] For the reasons stated below, the court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff’s motion and denies the Commissioner’s motion. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed applications for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits on May 29, 2015, alleging disability beginning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.