Fingix

iHealth Labs, Inc. v. Fingix

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20205:20-cv-05699California254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 IHEALTH LABS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-05699-VKD Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

Vv. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

FINGIX, I-ENTERPRISE, et al., Def . efendants

On August 14, 2020, the Court issued an initial case management scheduling order

v 14 || requiring the parties to submit a joint case management statement by November 10, 2020. Dkt.

|| No.6. Defendants have not appeared in this action or consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. 16 || Plaintiff iHealth Labs, Inc. did not file a case management statement by the November 10 deadline

= || and has taken no other action to prosecute the case other than to consent to magistrate judge

jurisdiction. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the 20 || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.