Jayaraman
Jayaraman v. Oakland Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEPHEN YOUNG, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00685-VC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. STRIKE REQUEST FOR
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 46 Defendants.
The School District’s motion to strike the request for injunctive relief is granted because the plaintiffs lack Article III standing to pursue injunctive relief. “To have standing to assert a claim for prospective injunctive relief, a plaintiff must demonstrate ‘that he is realistically threatened by a repetition of [the violation].’” Melendres v. Arpaio, 695 F.3d 990, 997 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 109 (1983)). The plaintiffs allege that they are parents and educators of students who attend schools in the District; that they participated in and spoke out at school board meetings to oppose school closures before the incident on October 23, 2019; and that, after the incident, they attended at least one meeting, during which the school board denied them participation by cutting the microphone. But these allegations are not enough. The…