Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 11, 20203:19-cv-04238California4,233 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. TO ENFORCE PRIOR ORDERS AND

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et al., COMPEL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 287, 292

13 Now pending before the court are two motions related to discovery disputes in this case. The first is Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for enforcement and sanctions (dkt. 287) through which they seek enforcement of two prior court orders that had granted Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of certain discovery. The second (dkt. 292) is a motion filed by Vade Secure, Inc. and Vade SASU (collectively, “Vade”) seeking the compelled production of Plaintiffs’ source code for inspection by an expert based in the United Kingdom. The underlying problem attending Plaintiffs’ need to file their motion for enforcement and sanctions has been Vade’s mistaken …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.