Best

Best v. Virgil Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20204:19-cv-02252California738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 BRIAN BEST, Case No. 4:19-cv-02252-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

MOTION TO PRODUCE; (2) DENYING

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND (3) GRANTING IN

VIRGIL SMITH, PART MOTION TO AMEND OR CORRECT

COMPLAINT

Defendant. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 65, 66,

11 Pro se plaintiff Brian Best has filed three motions before the Court: (1) a motion to produce certain evidence (Dkt. No. 65); (2) a motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 66); and a motion to amend or correct the complaint. (Dkt. No. 68.) For the reasons stated during the case management conference held on October 26, 2020, and for the reasons stated and confirmed below, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE these motions. Motion to Produce. As discussed at the case management conference, at this stage, the motion to produce is premature. The parties have only begun to engage in discovery. To the extent that there…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.