Farris
Farris v. 3M Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GARY FARRIS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-04186-JST Plaintiffs,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
Vv. PREJUDICE 3M COMPANY, et al., ll Defendants.
No pretrial statement having been filed by November 6, 2020 as ordered, ECF No. 267, || and no party having appeared at today’s pretrial conference as ordered, the Court concludes that || Plaintiffs are no longer prosecuting this case. The case is therefore dismissed with prejudice. Fed. a || R. Civ. P. 41(b); Van Bronkhorst v. Safeco Corp., 529 F.2d 943, 947 (9th Cir. 1976) (‘There is no || question that a District Court has the power to dismiss a claim of a plaintiff with prejudice for || failure to comply with an order of the court.”). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 13, 2020 .