Panah

Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20205:14-cv-00166California894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOOMAN PANAH, an individual, Case No. 14-00166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION; DENYING

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS;

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

CORRECTIONS AND

INSTRUCTIONS TO REHABILITATION, et al., DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL Defendants. (Docket Nos. 204, 208, 215)

17 Plaintiff, an inmate on death row at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) proceeding pro se, filed a second amended complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging unconstitutional acts by SQSP correctional officers. The operative complaint in this action is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) along with a supplemental complaint. Dkt. No. 54, 67. On September 29, 2020, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss claims as untimely and set briefing on the only remaining timely claim, i.e., an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.