Neo4j, Inc. v. Graph Foundation, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

NEO4J, INC.,

Case No. 5:19-cv-06226-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v.

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

GRAPH FOUNDATION, INC.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 74, 75 Defendant.

Plaintiffs Neo4j, Inc. (“Neo4j USA”) and Neo4j Sweden AB (“Neo4j Sweden” and together with Neo4j USA “Plaintiffs”) recently filed a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 65, “FAC”) in this matter against Graph Foundation, Inc. (“GFI”), GraphGrid, Inc. (“GraphGrid”), and AtomRain Inc. (“ARI” and altogether, “Defendants”). Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, GraphGrid and ARI seek to dismiss the fifth and seventh causes of action in the FAC. Dkt. No. 74 (“GraphGrid/ARI Motion”)). GFI separately seeks to dismiss the fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action. Dkt. No. 78 (“GFI Motion”). The Court took the …