Brown

Aerofund Holdings, Inc. v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20204:20-cv-03747California300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AEROFUND HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-03747-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

LISA BASSHAM BROWN, et al.,

Defendants.

13 On September 4, 2020, the Court granted plaintiff Aerofund Holdings, Inc.’s (“Aerofund”) request to continue the initial case management conference from September 8, 2020 to November 17, 2020. Dkt. No. 9. The Court further required the parties to submit a joint case management statement that complies with all applicable Civil Local Rules and Standing Orders by November 10, 2020. Id. at 2. Defendants have not appeared in this action or consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. No party filed a case management statement by the November 10 deadline. Other than serving defendants, Aerofund has taken no action to prosecute the case. See Dkt. No. 15. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.