Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. v. Agility Project Logistics, Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BIGGE CRANE AND RIGGING CO., Case No. 20-cv-01082-DMR
Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT AGILITY'S v. MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION
AGILITY PROJECT LOGISTICS, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. (“Bigge”) filed an action in state court against Defendants Agility Project Logistics, Inc. (“Agility”), BP Products North America, Inc. (“BP”), and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (“Jacobs”) alleging breach of contract and related claims. Agility removed the case to federal court and now moves to compel arbitration and to stay the action pending arbitration. [Docket No. 10.] BP and Jacobs do not oppose the motion. [Docket Nos. 23, 31.] Bigge does not oppose the motion to compel arbitration but argues that any arbitration proceedings should take place in the Northern District of California rather than Texas, which is the contractually-designated arbitration venue. [Docket…