In Re Aqua Metals, Inc. Securities Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20204:17-cv-07142California12,481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

1 A. Summary of Alleged False and Misleading Statements2 2 Aqua Metals is an early-stage company that was incorporated in 2014 and went public in 3 2015. SAC ¶¶ 45, 51. It developed a technology known as “AquaRefining” that recycles lead- 4 acid batteries (“LABs”). Id. ¶ 46. By 2015, at its test facility in California, the Company had 5 produced high purity lead from recycled LABs on a small-scale prototype of what would become 6 the basis of an AquaRefinery module, and had successfully replicated that performance on a 7 prototype of a full-scale electrolyzer, to produce 99.99% pure AquaRefined lead. Id. ¶ 123. 8 On May 19, 2016, the Company announced a strategic partnership with Interstate Batteries 9 (“IB”), pursuant to which IB invested about $10 million in the Company, and agreed to supply the 10 Company with more than one million LABs for the AquaRefineries. Id. ¶ 122; Dkt. No. 128-2, 11 Declaration of Michael Hogue in Support (“Hogue Decl.”) Ex. 3 (5/19/2016 Press Release). To 12 prepare for commercializing the technology, in August 2016, the Company announced it had 13 largely completed construction of its first AquaRefining facility at its Tahoe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.