San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20203:20-cv-04468California3,852 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID Case No. 20-cv-04468-EMC

TRANSIT DISTRICT,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 9 MOTIONS TO DISMISS v. 10 Docket Nos. 15, 18, 20

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE

11 COMPANY, et al.,

12 Defendants.

13 14 15 Plaintiff San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (“SF BART”) filed this suit against 16 Midwest Employers Casualty Company (“Midwest”), National Union Fire Insurance Company 17 (“National”), and Westport Insurance Company (“Westport”) (collectively, “Defendants”). 18 Defendants insured SF BART at different periods in time between July 1, 1992, and July 1, 2006. 19 SF BART raises two causes of action for (1) breach of contract; and (2) declaratory relief. 20 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ independently filed motions to dismiss pursuant 21 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). All three motions raise the same grounds for 22 dismissal: (1) judicial estoppel; (2) collateral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.